There are two incompatible and irreconcilable worldviews.<\/p>\n
\nOne, is the idea that humans evolved from animals and then, even within human society, there is a continual process of evolution and progress to higher stages of intellectuality and morality.<\/p>\n
The second is that humans began in a perfected state, or “Golden Age”, but through choices there has been a continual state of decline from that state of perfection, and only a cataclysmic event can restore a new state of perfection.<\/p>\n
There is certainly no scientific basis for evolution or progress. If, in fact, we do seem to observe change, progress, or evolution, then its etiology lies elsewhere. For every idea or movement, there is an impetus that sets it in motion, that brings about its realization. However, over time, that initial impetus gets distorted and every movement or organisation will tend to decline even to the point of turning into its very opposite. That is due to the common unconscious state of humanity. Nevertheless, it is possible at certain key moments in the process — and time is qualitative, not quantitative == that another conscious impetus can be applied to bring the process back into alignment. This can only come about through the activities of a conscious elite.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
There are two incompatible and irreconcilable worldviews. Anti-tradition One, is the idea that humans evolved from animals and then, even within human society, there is a continual process of evolution and progress to higher stages of intellectuality and morality. Tradition The second is that humans began in a perfected state, … Continue reading