{"id":16852,"date":"2022-11-09T21:21:23","date_gmt":"2022-11-10T02:21:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.gornahoor.net\/?p=16852"},"modified":"2022-11-10T11:58:03","modified_gmt":"2022-11-10T16:58:03","slug":"the-gnostic-sense","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gornahoor.net\/?p=16852","title":{"rendered":"The Gnostic Sense"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n\"\"<\/a>
High Priestess<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

If the practical teaching of the first Arcanum is \u201cconcentration without effort\u201d, the practical teaching of the second Arcanum is the development of the gnostic sense. And like the first, it sounds easy, yet is difficult. Nevertheless, paradoxically we are told it should be like play, effortless. Tomberg explains what he means by the gnostic sense.<\/p>\n

The gnostic sense is the same as the contemplative sense. Contemplation follows concentration and meditation; it begins as soon as logical and discursive thought is suspended. Typically, our minds are flooded with thoughts throughout the day, so the discursive and logical mind cannot conceive what it means to suspend itself. Yet, that is what the contemplative sense requires.<\/p>\n

Discursive thought wants to reach a conclusion, actually many conclusions. It is satisfied when it has many statements at its disposal, which it can repeat in various situations. It assumes it \u201cknows\u201d something, when it can repeat a conclusion.<\/p>\n

The gnostic sense begins at that point. Its method is \u201cdepth\u201d, so it seeks to understand the conclusion at a deeper layer, beyond words and thoughts. For example, I may learn the proof that \u201cGod exists\u201d in a philosophy class and be convinced; that is at the logical and discursive level. However, I do not yet \u201cknow\u201d the God who exists; that is a different \u201cknowing\u201d, or \u201cgnosis\u201d.<\/p>\n

While the mystical sense is analogous to the sense of touch, the gnostic sense is analogous to the sense of hearing. A person cannot hear his or her depths if all he can hear is the sound of his own thoughts echoing in consciousness. Hence, the thinking faculty must learn to slow down and even stop; it must do that to leave a \u201cclearing\u201d where the truth can reveal itself in its fullness. In the silence, the conclusion reached by the discursive mind \u201csinks in\u201d. The gnostic sense connects, in this way, the discursive mind to the mystical sense.<\/p>\n

Two Kinds of Memory<\/h2>\n

Tomberg next makes the interesting point that \u201cknowing\u201d is like \u201cremembering\u201d. I am sure everyone has had the frustrating experience of trying to remember something, or to say something that is \u201con the tip of the tongue\u201d. There is no way to \u201ctry\u201d to remember, no effort that will help. In my experience, the better path is to \u201clet go\u201d, relax, and the memory will appear in consciousness without effort. That is \u201chorizontal memory\u201d in time, which brings the past experience into the present. One then knows that experience again. This is related to archetypes or mythological memory.<\/p>\n

Gnosis, on the other hand, is the recall of the vertical, that which is \u201cabove\u201d which is then reflected in consciousness. Hence, gnosis is a form of recall, but from the higher to the lower, rather than from the past to the present. Tomberg provides us with the necessary conditions to reflect that which is above; they are related to the Arcanum.<\/p>\n