{"id":5381,"date":"2012-12-04T22:56:52","date_gmt":"2012-12-05T03:56:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.gornahoor.net\/?p=5381"},"modified":"2021-12-03T22:19:47","modified_gmt":"2021-12-04T03:19:47","slug":"creativity-nonduality-inspiration","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gornahoor.net\/?p=5381","title":{"rendered":"Creativity, Nonduality, Inspiration"},"content":{"rendered":"<blockquote><p>\nThe Genius is a man who discovers many others in himself. He is a man with many men in his personality. But then the genius can understand other men better than they can understand themselves, because within himself he has not only the character he is grasping, but also its opposite. Duality is necessary for observation and comprehension \u2026in short, to understand man means to have equal parts of himself and his opposite in one. ~ <strong>Otto Weininger<\/strong>\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<figure class=\"rightbox\">\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.gornahoor.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/12\/Leanan_Sidhe.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.gornahoor.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/12\/Leanan_Sidhe-300x169.jpg\" alt=\"Leanan S\u00eddhe\" title\"Leanan S\u00eddhe\" width=\"300\" height=\"169\" \/><\/a><figcaption>Leanan S\u00eddhe<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Recently, we turned to <a href=\"?p=5098\"><strong>Boethius<\/strong> for an explanation of the types of knowledge<\/a>: sensory and psychic impressions, rational thought, and intellectual intuition. Since intuition is what separates Tradition from philosophical or scientific systems, it is well worth the trouble to go over it again. A woman once told me that she has \u201chunches\u201d which she took to mean gnosis; of course, what we mean has nothing to do with so-called \u201cwoman\u2019s intuition\u201d, but with a direct knowledge that brings absolute certainty.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"?p=5323\"><strong>Vladimir Solovyov<\/strong> relates intuition<\/a> to \u201can inner union of perfect individuality with complete generality or universality\u201d, and he points to the artist as the proof of intuition. That is because the artistic inspiration unites the concrete individual with its wholeness in the formless realm. This non-dual intuition differs from rational thinking which involves a subject and an object. <strong>David Loy<\/strong>, in his study of various teachings on <cite>Nonduality<\/cite>, refers to the personal experiences of several artists to demonstrate nondual thinking. However, artistic intuition is still not metaphysical realization or mystical intuition, since, as the examples will show, the artist is passive in relation to it and experiences it as an external force. Nevertheless, the examples are instructive and will help the reader become aware of his own everyday nondual experiences; for example, there may be that \u201caha\u201d moment of \u201cgetting it\u201d when the flow of the rational mind is temporarily halted.<\/p>\n<p>We have so many thoughts in a day that we usually take them for granted. We claim they are \u201cour\u201d thoughts, or \u201cour\u201d ideas. A little reflection will show that cannot be true. We don\u2019t know what we will think about one minute from now, as thoughts come from a source of their own against our will. Usually we become \u201clost in thought\u201d, as thoughts link themselves together in an intricate story and take over our conscious mind and even feelings. Obviously, this inhibits metaphysical realization since the proper order of things is for the \u201cI\u201d to dominate the other parts of conscious activity including the thought process. It is a good practice to sit quietly while trying to maintain a conscious detachment over the automatic processes of the mind. Then it will be possible to observe thoughts in their incipient stage. By maintaining conscious detachment, these thoughts will not be able to link and they will dissipate like wispy clouds in the wind. Otherwise, they will agglutinate into complex formations, and we will fantasize faces, things, and events as we usually do when staring at cloud formations in the sky.<\/p>\n<p>Musical composition provides the easiest examples of artistic inspiration since it is the most abstract of the arts. The common experience is that the composition is grasped as a whole first, and only afterwards are the individual notes written down. This all-at-once feeling is what defines inspiration. In our spatial awareness, we are accustomed to grasping our field of sensory experience as a whole; however, it is more difficult to experience time that way. That is, how can the sequential elements of a temporal sequence be understood as a single whole? Yet, we do that all the time when we hear a symphony; although we experience each note and each instrument in time, we still grasp the symphony as a whole. We will have more to say about this when discussing how God can know the future.<\/p>\n<p>I will let the artists speak for themselves. First we have <strong>Mozart<\/strong>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nAll this fires my soul and, provided I am not disturbed, my subject enlarges itself, becomes methodized and defined, and the whole, though it be long, stands almost complete and finished in my mind, so that I can survey it, like a fine picture or a beautiful statue, at a glance \u2026 All this inventing, this producing, takes place in a pleasing, lively dream.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Loy points out that the subject enlarges or creates itself and it is dreamlike because there is no \u201cthinker\u201d or directing ego. <strong>Tchaikovsky<\/strong>\u2019s experience is similar:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nGenerally speaking, the germ of a future composition comes suddenly and unexpectedly \u2026 It takes root with extraordinary force and rapidity, shoots up through the earth, puts forth branches and leaves, and finally blossoms.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Some composers relate this to a religious experience. <strong>Puccini<\/strong> says:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nThe music of this opera [<cite>Madam Butterfly<\/cite>] was dictated to me by God; I was merely instrumental in putting it on paper and communicating it to the public.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Wagner<\/strong>\u2019s experience is that:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nThere are universal currents of Divine Thought vibrating the ether everywhere \u2026 I feel that I am one with this vibrating force.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Finally, we need to hear what <strong>Nietzsche<\/strong> had to say:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nHas anyone at the end of the nineteenth century any distinct notion of what poets of a stronger age understood by the word inspiration?\u00a0 If not, I will describe it.\u00a0If you had the slightest residue of superstition left in you, it would hardly be possible to completely disregard the idea that one is the mere incarnation, a mouthpiece or a medium of an almighty power.\u00a0The idea of revelation in the sense of something which profoundly moves and provokes, becoming suddenly visible and audible with indescribable certainty and accuracy\u2014is a simple description.\u00a0You hear &mdash; you do not seek; you take &mdash; and do not ask who gives: a thought suddenly flashes up like lightning, it comes as a necessity, without hesitation &mdash; I have never had any choice in the matter.\u00a0There is an ecstasy so great that the immense strain of it is sometimes relaxed by a flood of tears during which one does not know whether one is coming or going.\u00a0There is the feeling of completely being outside of oneself, with the very distinct consciousness of endless delicate shivers right down to one\u2019s toes; &mdash; there is a depth of happiness in which the most painful and gloomy parts do not detract from the whole but are produced and required as necessary shades of colour amidst such an overflow of light.\u00a0There is an instinct for rhythmical relationships which embrace a whole world of forms: length, the need of an all-embracing rhythm, is almost the measure of the force of inspiration, a kind of compensation for its pressure and tension.<br \/>\n<br \/>\nEverything happens quite involuntarily as if in a tempestuous outburst of freedom of absolute power and divinity.\u00a0The involuntary nature of the images and similes is the most remarkable thing; one loses all perception of what is imagery and metaphor; everything seems to present itself in the readiest, the truest and simplest means of expression.\u00a0It actually seems, to use one of Zarathustra\u2019s own phrases, as if all things came together and offered themselves as images\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Loy mentions several other poets, writers, and even mathematicians who have had similar experiences. Although Loy\u2019s primary focus is on nonduality as understood in Taoism, the Vedanta, and Buddhism, he does show how this is the same as intellectual intuition as understood by <strong>Plotinus<\/strong>, <strong>Meister Eckhart<\/strong>, <strong>Nicolas of Cusa<\/strong>, and <strong>Boehme<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>Update 25 Feb 2021<br \/>\nI spent 10 minutes searching for creativity. There are articles about how the neurons of creative people are different from the uncreative. As if neurons can create novelty out of nothing. The other modern view, completely opposed to the first, is that creativity can be taught to anyone at random.<\/p>\n<p>If you think you are creative, do you understand any of quotes above? Creativity is dangerous: it is not a medical condition nor can you learn it at a weekend seminar. You need to surrender your imagination to forces whose source you neither know nor understand.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>You hear &mdash; you do not seek; you take &mdash; and do not ask who gives: a thought suddenly flashes up like lightning, it comes as a necessity, without hesitation &mdash; I have never had any choice in the matter.\u00a0There is an ecstasy so great that the immense strain of it is sometimes relaxed by a flood of tears during which one does not know whether one is coming or going. ~ Nietzsche <span class=\"continue-reading\"><a href=\"https:\/\/gornahoor.net\/?p=5381\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":13938,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"fifu_image_url":"","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[8,10],"tags":[805,454,806,1177],"class_list":["post-5381","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-art","category-metaphysics","tag-david-loy","tag-friedrich-nietzsche","tag-nonduality","tag-vladimir-solovyov"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/gornahoor.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5381","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/gornahoor.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/gornahoor.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gornahoor.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gornahoor.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=5381"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/gornahoor.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5381\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":15335,"href":"https:\/\/gornahoor.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5381\/revisions\/15335"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gornahoor.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/13938"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/gornahoor.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=5381"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gornahoor.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=5381"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gornahoor.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=5381"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}