Anyone attracted to political action should read those political scientists who describe how men actually are and act, not as they should in some imaginary world. Only then can men be led effectively. Most today will think that is immoral. To the contrary, the result is Order, Authority, and Unity \u2026 the highest morality you can and should expect in a state.<\/p>\n
Man is faithful by nature; woman is promiscuous. Man wants to protect his own; this entails exclusion. Woman wants to nurture indiscriminately; this entails inclusion.<\/p>\n
Those capable of thinking only in material terms and images or who understand time only in terms of number, will never grasp much of anything.<\/p>\n
Eckhart said that the beginning of spirituality is dependent on recognizing what one is as a being outside time.<\/p>\n
Identity is not biological. USA was 90% white in my childhood, Boston much more, but that means nothing. In Virgin Spring<\/a>, T\u00f6re was a noble, a father and patriarch, his daughter beautiful and blonde and virginal — they lived in the light. The maidservant was dark, promiscuous, and played with frogs. In our time, many think that is \u201ctradition\u201d and are attracted to the bizarre, the abnormal, the ugly. The shepherds who gave into their craven lusts were also ethnic Swedes. So who then is a Swede according to the Identity movements? In Evola\u2019s expression, who is \u201cof race\u201d? That is a spiritual quality and by the law of involution\/evolution, not all who appear so are the bearers of the race.<\/p>\n Organizations eventually fail because the leaders become weak and indiscriminate; they have no standards or no longer adhere to them; the refuse to enforce discipline. Instead, they prefer to be \u201cnice\u201d and \u201cinclusive\u201d, proving the hold that the modern mind still has on them. Stronger men know who is in and who is out. There was an order in the last century that banned non-fathers and atheists. In our time the new right and the identity right embrace them. They have their reasons, none of them good, and are more in the nature of confabulations.<\/p>\n Even a blog should strive to be what it describes, to the limited extent that is possible. That is why certain rules on commenting are established, more as an experiment. To reject a certain type of comment is not to reject all; that is the way boys think. One fellow who was asked to take some time out from commenting did so, but came back after a suitable time elapsed. That I can respect.<\/p>\n Androphiles try to act like men, so they use f**k a lot in their writings to show how macho they are. That may have had a chance to be true at one time, but now that even high school girls speak like that, it no longer has any impact. Do you want a handbook on acting manly? Learn to be chivalrous. I just saved you the price of a useless book.<\/p>\n Men don\u2019t relish considering themselves as victims.<\/p>\n Men are in tenuous positions today, forced into submission to those who have no right to authority over them. But even the slave Epictetus was free.<\/p>\n Thanks to facebook, I found out that there are certain things men are supposed to believe only because it is the 21st<\/sup> century. It saves all the trouble of thinking, using logic, and research; instead, it is only necessary to check one\u2019s calendar. Who knows what will be the cause du jour<\/i> next year, in 5 years, in 10? Is there someone in charge of this or do all the locusts get hungry at the same time?<\/p>\n I don\u2019t care very much about people\u2019s opinions; what interests me is their inner state. What is it like to be them? What caste would they be, which spiritual race? It takes a few probing questions and to discern that by listening carefully to their answers. A man\u2019s knowledge is something different.<\/p>\n People create sand castles out of words and then try to live in them. Words have depth or perhaps not. Do they express something real or are they just nominal? Few can distinguish between the natural and the artificial.<\/p>\n I still remember my dreams as a baby and the first time I realized I was an \u201cI\u201d. But I haven\u2019t yet been able to remember who was dreaming the baby into existence.<\/p>\n Gurdjieff told the story about a magician who hypnotized his sheep into believing they were men. It did not work out well for the sheep because the charade was eventually found out and they felt worse than if they had simply accepted being sheep.<\/p>\n Esoteric writing is always incomplete, leaving something out, even being misleading, while expecting the correct readers to discern the secret meaning.<\/p>\n Who built the bus?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Anyone attracted to political action should read those political scientists who describe how men actually are and act, not as they should in some imaginary world. Only then can men be led effectively. Most today will think that is immoral. To the contrary, the result is Order, Authority, and Unity … Continue reading