{"id":6999,"date":"2013-11-18T22:51:41","date_gmt":"2013-11-19T03:51:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.gornahoor.net\/?p=6999"},"modified":"2013-11-18T22:51:41","modified_gmt":"2013-11-19T03:51:41","slug":"new-thought-and-tradition","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gornahoor.net\/?p=6999","title":{"rendered":"New Thought and Tradition"},"content":{"rendered":"

\nEvery day, in every way, I am getting better and better ~ Emile Cou\u00e9<\/strong>\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Before providing translations of Julius Evola<\/strong>\u2019s essays on the New Thought movement in Europe and the ideas of Emile Cou\u00e9, I want to offer some personal observations. I will also supplement Evola\u2019s material with the comparable ideas from in Fr. Alois Wiesinger<\/strong>\u2019s book Occult Phenomena<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Some time ago, at the beginning of the eighties, I received in the mail an offer to subscribe to a glossy magazine promising in depth articles on various traditions. I decided to take a subscription to it. I don\u2019t recall the name of it now. They only published a few numbers before they ceased operations. However, they did offer a selection of similar magazines that agreed to fulfill the remainder of the subscription. There was one that grabbed my attention. It represented a point of view that I had never previously confronted. To top it off, it purported to combine two topics of intense interest to me: science and the mind.<\/p>\n

The small magazine was called the \u201cScience of Mind<\/strong>\u201d and, since it was already paid for, I decided to take it. As I learned more about that movement, I discovered that it was part of a larger movement called \u201cNew Thought\u201d and was a cousin of Christian Science. Its influence in popular culture has been great as it has appeared in many guises: most recently as the \u201cLaw of Attraction\u201d, but also in Positive Thinking, and even among neo-Christians such as the infamous Joel Osteen. I won\u2019t go into the entire history of the movement, but suffice it to say that I spent several years taking various classes and studying the relevant texts.<\/p>\n

I always heard in Science of Mind classes that they teach what the \u201cmystics have always taught\u201d. That motivated me to actually read those mystics for myself. The results were mixed. Yes, there were ideas from the mystics and also many distorted Hermetic and esoteric teachings in New Thought. That just gave me the motivation to seek out the real thing itself. I will here mention a few of those ideas and conclude with what the mystics really taught.<\/p>\n

Pragmatism<\/h2>\n

The American philosopher William James<\/strong>, in The Varieties of Religious Experience<\/i>, considered New Thought (or Mind Cure) as the religion of healthy mindedness. In contrast, he regarded the major representatives of the major traditions as \u201cmorbid-minded\u201d. This is reminiscent of the flaccid distinction made by some between \u201clife affirming\u201d and \u201clife denying\u201d religions. Pragmatism does not bother with the truth value of a thought or theory but rather is concerned only with its effects. Specifically, Prof James feels that being \u201chealthy minded\u201d in the sense he means by it is a desirable goal. Hence, any belief that leads to that psychological state is considered \u201ctrue\u201d.<\/p>\n

Pragmatism has infected Western thought in unsuspected ways. It explains, for example, the worst of political correctness. Its adherents, for example, desire a particular social state of affairs. Hence, any idea or outlook that tends to promote that social state is considered true or valid, while any idea that threatens to undermine that state must be vehemently repressed. The result is that anyone who wants to look at things \u201cscientifically\u201d or \u201cobjectively\u201d can only be frustrated in verbal confrontations with the other group. Of course, \u201cscience\u201d itself can be distorted and used in a pragmatic way, hence it is not the defeater in an argument that some would hope for. Pragmatism is a sophisticated philosophy, so it is beside the point to consider progressives as evil or stupid. A more sophisticated worldview is the antidote.<\/p>\n

We see pragmatism used in an unsophisticated way among the so-called new\/alt right or neo-traditionalist crowd. The distinguishing feature uniting them is the emphasis on \u201crace\u201d or other form of zoological identitarianism. Hence, they evaluate every worldview, politico-philosophical system, religion, or tradition by how well it promotes their view of identity. There is no other standard, not even the truth of the idea. Just to be clear once again, for Tradition, the fundamental identity is that of Spirit, prior to any other form of identity. Such a position is immune to the ravages of pragmatism.<\/p>\n

Visualizations<\/h2>\n

The goal of New Thought, in all its guises, is some form of magic and techniques associated with magic are thus employed. However, the magic is on the level of the personal. Sorcery, or the use of lower forces, is not deliberately used. Neither is the higher form of sacred magic at issue. New Thought does not believe in a cosmic law or a divine person. Rather divinity is regarded as impersonal, subject to certain laws which an agent can use to his advantage. Oftentimes, the \u201cuniverse\u201d is substituted for divinity, as the \u201cuniverse will provide\u201d or \u201crespond\u201d.<\/p>\n

Hence New Thought movements use some variation of thought control and\/or visualization, which is really a form of concentration although I never encountered any teachers teaching concentration as such. The premise is that such practices can alter persons, places, things, or conditions. Visualizing objects of desire will somehow bring them into one\u2019s possession. Of course, in Hermetic practice, visualizations are used to lead to higher states of consciousness. For example, one may visualize being in the presence of higher beings, a practice which may lead one to that state. It would be incorrect to believe that such visualizations are ineffective. In actuality, we are creating our selves, or our self images, on an ongoing basis via unconscious visualizations throughout the day.<\/p>\n

Mind Treatments and the Unconscious<\/h2>\n

Instead of visualizations, usually thoughts are more commonly used. For example, I may say, if I feel ill, that \u201cI am well and in perfect health\u201d. This is supposed to counteract the initial thought of disease. However, a few minutes per day of positive thoughts are seldom sufficient to counteract the 60,000 thoughts per day that flow randomly through one\u2019s consciousness.<\/p>\n

A favorite Biblical quote in this movement is \u201cAs a man thinketh in his heart, so he is.\u201d Now that makes more sense, since the heart is one\u2019s intellectual center which, in a fully developed person, dominates the other functions of the mind. But, those thoughts are beyond words and conscious thought are merely their reflection in the mind. As such, they cannot be controlled at will, but through mental purification, perhaps truly higher thoughts will dwell in one\u2019s heart. However, such thoughts will be unrelated to the desire for a new Maserati or an Alaskan cruise.<\/p>\n

Mantras<\/h2>\n

Now there are certainly stories about miraculous events effectuated through mystics. In genuine mysticism, this will be the result of sacred magic and will have a totally different character from personal magic or sorcery. New Thought is not interested in sacred magic, gnosis, or higher states. On the contrary, it prides itself on being \u201cpractical\u201d (or \u201cpragmatic\u201d), so that it can use the occult forces for personal benefit in a more or less mechanical way. There is no emphasis at all on any sort of purification of the types explained in Julius Evola\u2019s essay recently made available on this blog.<\/p>\n

Now the repetition of positive thoughts in a \u201cmind treatment\u201d is ultimately ineffective without such purification. Such a mind treatment is really a form of mantra \u201calthough one can repeat it a million times, but as long as it is not known<\/i>, it remains a mere flapping of the lips\u201d. Hence, the missing link in New Thought is that gnosis. Certainly, thought has an influence in the world of manifestation, since knowing the true name of a thing is to know its essence. However, the true gnosis of a mantra requires intense development, which is not a part of any New Thought teaching. Moreover, such a thinking is not merely passive in the sense that the \u201cuniverse will respond\u201d to one\u2019s thoughts. Rather, there has to be a force or will associated with it.<\/p>\n

The Placebo Effect and the Unconscious<\/h2>\n

A simpler explanation of certain results that make New Thought plausible is the \u201cplacebo effect\u201d, by which a materially ineffective medication actual produces a real healing provided the person truly believes the medication is effective. Emile Cou\u00e9, in his work as a pharmacist, noted that his customers would often report a cure even when he gave them a placebo, or inert sugar pill. Due to space considerations, I will treat this in a separate post.<\/p>\n

It is interesting to see how esoteric ideas get distorted in the popular mind. That is why such teachings can be hidden in \u201cplain view\u201d. It is also why \u201cinitiation\u201d is necessary, or else their true significance might never be realized.<\/p>\n

After a post on the metaphysical basis of what is valid in New Thought, based on Fr. Wiesinger\u2019s book Occult Phenomena<\/i>, we will present an alternative worldview, the one that the mystics actually taught.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Every day, in every way, I am getting better and better ~ Emile Cou\u00e9 Before providing translations of Julius Evola\u2019s essays on the New Thought movement in Europe and the ideas of Emile Cou\u00e9, I want to offer some personal observations. I will also supplement Evola\u2019s material with the comparable … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[17,374],"tags":[1010,1008,1012,1009,1011],"class_list":["post-6999","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-paranormal","category-spirituality-2","tag-emile-coue","tag-new-thought","tag-pragmatism","tag-science-of-mind","tag-william-james"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/gornahoor.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6999","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/gornahoor.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/gornahoor.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gornahoor.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gornahoor.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=6999"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/gornahoor.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6999\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/gornahoor.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=6999"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gornahoor.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=6999"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gornahoor.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=6999"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}